Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Baillie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 10:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jamie Baillie

Delete. Not a notable enough person to warrant a page, i d say. Mayumashu 06:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete No claims as to notability. -- (aeropagitica)  07:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge relevant bits to Credit Union Atlantic and Delete the rest. Regards, Ben Aveling 08:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 09:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Credit Union Atlantic -- Astrokey44|talk 13:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

• KeepYou make a fair point re whether the article, as I initially drafted it, portrayed an individual notable enough to warrant a page. I have added further information which, I submit, establishes Baillie as a noteworthy Nova Scotian, one from whom we will hear more in the future. Please reconsider the proposed deletion of this article; I respectfully request that it be allowed to remain. JohnMacDonell 18:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

if this individual becomes the person you feel he will, write the page up then. this does look like an attempt to promote this person to benefit his political ambitions (John MacDonell is the name of the president of the political party mentioned on the Jamie Baillie page) Mayumashu 05:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Weak conditional delete. If someone can cite proof that he's a leading contender to take over leadership of the government, or if someone can expand on his time as Hamm's chief of staff, then keep. -- Mwalcoff 00:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I've seen worse bios. Article needs to be wikified. Atrian 06:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• He's pulled out of the running, according to Nova Scotia Progressive Conservative leadership election, 2006. He's borderline notable, but I think he still just falls short. I'm prepared to be convinced otherwise, but unless there is something more, I'm voting Incredibly weak delete. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.