Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James eden

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 23:10, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] James eden

Not notable. Should be deleted. Thue | talk 10:56, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 11:16, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like vanity. - Mailer Diablo 11:18, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not famous. Ethereal 11:19, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly personal attack page - David Gerard 13:16, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - I don't think it's a personal attack because it looks autobiographical. But I don't think it's so much vanity as someone confusing Wikipedia with a personal homepage host. Treborbassett 17:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Jonathunder 20:51, 2005 Mar 13 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing is alleged in this non-article that even remotely justifies its existence. Would have to be reworked from scratch for me to change my mind. --Daniel C. Boyer 21:34, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. In the future, tag articles like these with {{delete}}. This kind of nonsense falls well within the criteria for speedy deletion. NTK 03:31, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.