Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Walker (author)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. Sango123 03:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] James Walker (author)

Joint nomination with White Vans and Candy. This was an incomplete AfD nomination. Appears to be a tiny walled garden: two articles that depend upon each other for existance. Notability not asserted but not matching a speedy criterion for the second of the two. Technical nomination: no opinion expressed by me. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Rje 00:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Oppose. I really don't think either of them should be deleted, just expanded. --The greatest man in the universe 00:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

User is blocked indef. Naconkantari 23:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete both. Columnist and column on www.thewrestlingfan.com, Alexa rank: 2,626,793. Dismally fails WP:WEB, which is the relevant criterion here. Fan-1967 01:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both The website itself isnt notable enough for inclusion, why would an article and its author belong? The James Walker article reads like vanity or a cut-n-paste from somewhere, is completely unsourced and unverified. Resolute 02:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • User:TrackerTV/AFD Delete
• Delete both, site fails WP:WEB, author fails WP:BIO. Also remove link from James Walker disambiguation page. And, yes, DYN-O-MITE! --Kinu ^t/_c 03:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both per Kinu. TheronJ 15:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both per nom. Naconkantari 23:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both per nom. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.