Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Slee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James_Slee

James_Slee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

not notable and most sources are a novelization FreedomByDesign 22:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

• keep sufficient good sources exist. Clarify what comes from the novelisation & remove unless it too is notable. consider re-titling. All editing questions. DGG (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

correction--it is not a novelization, but I am frankly not sure it's a sufficiently RS to stand alone, and this sort of material needs additional support. At least the court decisions can be cited from better sources. And the tone does need improvement, best done by omission of unencyclopedic detail. DGG (talk) 04:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete from reading the article, it sounds like this person may have died due to negligence of another party. I just don't see any historic notability in this - WP:NOT#NEWS Corpx 23:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep There are plenty of sources. I can't see that any of the sources are from a novelisation. Do you mean Outrageous Betrayal, which is described as a work of investigative journalism.Merkinsmum 01:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is certainly not encyclopedic material- no historic notability at all. On top of that the only source of the "facts" is _Outrageous Betrayal_ which is generally regarded as a piece of muckraking. Alex Jackl 12:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Corpx. Bearian 12:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not Noteable. Ebay3 16:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• merge into the main article about the seminars. The individual doesn't seem to be that notable, but should be mentioned in the main article. JoshuaZ 18:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Merge (and possibly redirect) per JoshuaZ. --Aarktica 21:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is not someone who belongs in an encyclopedia. There is nothing of interest here to deserve an article.--Saladdays 23:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.