Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Robert Roe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. - Bobet 22:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] James Robert Roe

Delete No sources. Likely vanity. Included with several other articles relating to "Roe Family" and "Modern Kings of Munster". Guliolopez 11:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - vanity article. --Ryano 11:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - nonsense. BrendanH 11:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. ant_ie 12:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. --Terence Ong 13:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete (yawn} Snalwibma 16:35, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable vanity, WP:VANITY refers.  (aeropagitica)  16:39, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not-notable or non-sense. Djegan 19:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable, vanity. Bastun 13:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense, vanity. Angus McLellan 15:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unable to verify. Not consistent with available information on the Kings of Munster. Likely hoax. Accurizer 19:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.