Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Parman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Parman

James Parman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable artist. No sources. Search for "James Parman" abstract returns 3 unique ghits...none related to this person. When first created, the article was a blatant copyvio mixture of statements about 2 other artists. (see Talk:James Parman). Prod removed by original author. --Onorem♠Dil 17:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete No sources to back up the article's claims. Non-notable--even the article says he's "up and coming".--Sethacus 17:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 16:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Possible speedy delete. Freshacconci | Talk 16:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Modernist 02:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of sources, notability. JNW 02:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.