Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Parkhouse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as a WP:HOAX per WP:SNOW. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 22:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] James Parkhouse

James Parkhouse (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a hoax, created by Lord Cuthberton (talk · contribs), and just be reading the article we can tell it is a joke. Alientraveller (talk) 10:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete as WP:HOAX Mayalld (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as a hoax. In case anyone wants evidence, the IMDB doesn't show the subject on the actor lists of any of the three movies the article credits him with which are currently released, and the Heros WP article makes no mention of him (although WP isn't a reliable source). --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 11:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • deleteis faily obviously a hoax, since it says he's 7'4' born in 1919 and maried to yoko ono.Ratman9999 (talk) 11:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Sting_au Talk 11:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax. WP:SNOW, please. Yngvarr 11:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone above; clearly a hoax. I second the move to snowball this. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 12:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Strongest Possible Delete absolute and total trash. Userpage indicates user is only editing Wikipedia "for fun". If this is his idea of fun, better to block him now and get it over with. JuJube (talk) 20:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete there really should be a speedy category for blatantly obvious hoaxes like this. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 22:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.