Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Newbury Fitz-Gerald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Owen× ☎ 00:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] James Newbury Fitz-Gerald

Believed to be the uncle of John Driscoll Fitz-Gerald (above), but gets even fewer google hits. Looks like somebody's trying to exploit their lineage on a non-geneology website, maybe? — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 19:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

• Weak keep Don't know that Ghits is the best measure for a 19th century bishop. He existed although his notability is certainly somewhat questionable. Dlyons493 Talk 21:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I like to give bishops the benefit of the doubt, and he is included in The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography and a couple of other late 19th/early 20th century reference works, according to a reference in the World Biographical Information System Online (WBIS Online) (here, subscription site). u p p l a n d 23:21, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Uppland, again. -- DS1953 05:54, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.