Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Fitzmaurice(Coventry)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-10 23:59Z
[edit] James Fitzmaurice(Coventry)
I was starting to clean it up, till I realized, when I'm done there won't be anything left. I really don't want this deleted, but I don't see a good cleanup option, so it may be the best choice to delete. YechielMan 09:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO. No external sources other than his own website and MySpace; no evidence of external coverage by independent sources. Walton monarchist89 10:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Could become notable if signed up by one of the "two interested companies", but per WP:CRYSTAL it's difficult to argue keep. --Dweller 12:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as not yet notable per WP:BIO. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
