Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James D. Montgomery (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 12:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James D. Montgomery

James D. Montgomery (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Subject clearly fails WP:PROF; nn professor. Eusebeus 05:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep --Kevin Murray 21:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. The WP:PROF problems in the previous AFD appear to have been addressed. The article could stand a copyedit and cleanup per the MOS, but nothing warrants deletion. Serpent's Choice 03:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep The articles cited are every one of them in the very highest quality journals in their fields, as can be judged either from JCReports or knowing the subjects or by looking at the journals. This is actually a very notable career indeed, and his CV will be useful as an illustration of the career of a very successful social science professor at a premier research university. (Wisconsin). I wonder if I am beginning to detect some sort of bias against truly notable academic figures?DGG 05:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Unless the nominator can come up with reasons beyond "nn professor", an argument that was rejected in the last AFD. In other words, explain why the award is insignificant and does not confer notability. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.