Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Craik (second nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus Computerjoe's talk 17:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] James Craik (second nomination)

This is still a very short article providing little or no context as per my first nomination, and was kept with little debate. The last attempt to add to this article was deemed copyvio and deleted. I just don't see why a one-sentence entry should be kept. Danny Lilithborne 22:01, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Reyk YO! 22:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Just because he was real isn't enough. Fluit 22:30, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, as I've now expanded it to an actual article. Figure is plainly noteworthy, and to be honest, I'm kind of surprised that none of y'all took the time to expand it yourself. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 05:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
It was expanded before but then reverted because of presumed copyvio, although I don't think that was a good reason: as a work of the United States Government no copyright protection is available for it, as provided by 17 U.S.C. ยง 105. --LambiamTalk 05:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Well, after reading the (very good) new entry, I'd like to withdraw my nomination. If this is what it took to get good information in this article, then that's fine. Danny Lilithborne 06:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep after the superb expansion by Hit bull,win steak - Peripitus 13:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep revision. Stifle (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.