Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James C. McDonald

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 08:15Z

[edit] James C. McDonald

James C. McDonald (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Does not seem to be notable. The article was deleted by Prod but resurrected. Prod is contested Alex Bakharev 02:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, accomplishment is not notability. --Dhartung | Talk 04:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete A fine human being, but not notable such as to need an article. His accomplishments in his profession and elsewhere were not sufficiently great, imho. --Brianyoumans 04:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete While the subject was clearly notable to his friends and family, the article does not appear to pass WP:BIO Jeepday 04:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Nice obituary, but not encyclopedic. ScottMainwaring 07:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom. Artaxiad 08:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It's a not very good obituary. Good man maybe, but I won't be sending donations! Emeraude 15:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sounds like a gentleman and a scholar, but not a wikipedia bio article subject. TonyTheTiger 23:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • delete No evidence for notability in the material provided. DGG 02:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete'per nom. I'm sure he was a great guy who lived a full life. However I cannot see that he passes the biography guidelines. Suriel1981 09:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete notability tests fail on this article. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 05:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.