Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Browning Kepple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speeedy delete both as nn-bios. Stifle (talk) 16:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Browning Kepple

James Browning Kepple (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Kim Göransson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability has not been established for these creative professionals. No evidence of sufficient third-party sources. Likely conflict of interest, see WP:COIN#James Browning Kepple. Also nominated is Kim Göransson. Ghits are 124 and 877 respectively. Contested prods. MER-C 04:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete both per nom. Keb25 04:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete both -- a kind of walled garden of non-notability and mutual WP:COI. I traced a few Ghits and found nothing notable beyond the very small publisher. Accounting4Taste 04:26, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I would like to point out, also, this article, which was related and deleted when the prod expired, should also be added in if it comes back. --UsaSatsui 07:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete both - COI & NN. Everyone's a poet... Spawn Man 11:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete both - A detailed search did not reveal any sourced material that could be added to the article. The topics do not meet the general notability guidelines. -- Jreferee t/c 19:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.