Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bie

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] James Bie

Possible vanity. --Neigel von Teighen 21:06, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Nonsense, vanity, not notable, etc. Sheldrake 21:18, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, non-notable. Quale 23:33, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme prejudice. It's not even possible vanity - it's patent nonsense. Should have been under speedy delete. --khaosworks 00:06, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, obvious vanity. Megan1967 05:17, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. --Carnildo 22:34, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:36, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.