Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Anest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Anest

James Anest (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article seems to fail the criteria for notability as specified in Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Criteria for notability of people (such as: 1) not the subject of a independent bio, 2) has not received significant awards such as a Tony or Emmy, 3) does not have "demonstrable name recognition", etc). In addition, it has been tagged as such since May 2007. Sliposlop 19:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete - Looks like just nominating the article for deletion wasn't enough, so to avoid ambiguity, I'm explicitly recommending deletion for the reasons I cited above.Sliposlop 18:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete - I agree with the nom. Fails WP:BIO as it reads. The person's accomlishments are interesting but not noteworthy. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 19:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep has references, it's verifiable Elmao 19:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck 18:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, verifiable does not mean notable. Corvus cornix 22:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, clearly fails WP:BIO and is not linked on any other articles. Only one minor credit at IMDb. shoeofdeath 23:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.