Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James A Reed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 00:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] James A Reed

I don't think the guy is notable. talk to JD wants e-mail 10:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment: A search reveals many James A. Reeds, so without sources the article is not easily verifiable. --HResearcher 02:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete No sources are listed. --HResearcher 11:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

*Delete — Sources required which directly assert notability. Wikilinks needed Martinp23 12:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Martin, we found a reliable source. See Ohconfucious' comment below. --HResearcher 07:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Possibly vanity. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 22:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. I believe I have found him. Up to you to decide whether he's notable or not.... Ohconfucius 06:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Reed is one of UK's biggest recruitment companies according to that article. --HResearcher 07:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: The article needs more sources. Most of what has been written here is not sourced. --HResearcher 07:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - based on the bove, he seems notable enough, but the article does need more sources. Martinp23 08:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete completely middle of the road businessman--Tess Tickle 13:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of UK-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 09:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep based on the new information but it needs more sources and some explanation of what the company does. The news article is better than the Wikipedia article. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 15:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Hi - I was the source of original copy and have now entered in some information on the company and also links. Hope this was of interest. Interested in any further comments. Martin Warnes --193.41.34.100 13:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Withdraw nomination talk to JD wants e-mail 13:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.