Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakob Trollbäck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Merge considered, but no sourced information available to merge. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 22:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jakob Trollbäck

Jakob Trollbäck (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

The notability of this person is doubtful. This has also been discussed in the Swedish version of the article. No citations, only external links. About 300 Google hits. See also Trollback + Company. Vints (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep - I'd say he's notable as the founder of Trollback + Company, which seems notable. Some of the google results (2860, not 300 as you said) can assert notability; [1] seems to, as could [2] and [3]. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
    • In google search you must go to the last page to see how many actual hits there are. See [4]: "In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 280 already displayed."
      • OK, so I'm wrong on that count. What about the sources provided? dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
        • In my opinion the external links only indicate that the company might be relevant. Vints (talk) 06:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - With full citation, he'd demonstrate questionable notability, as it stands, it's a puff piece about a minor design principal wiht no significant notability. ThuranX (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge to Trollback + Company. Fails WP:BIO and seems to have no notability apart from the company. Collectonian (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • merge Through his company he has some notability but he has not received coverage on "reliable secondary sources" as the article itself shows. ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 19:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete As per nom.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.