Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake mclean
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Delete per CSD G7. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 21:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jake mclean
Non-notable trilogy, possible hoax Naconkantari e|t||c|m 17:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- This page was created to alert people of the significance of the potential of this future culinary and martial arts star. Although this only know to a few film students, his work may soon be internationally recognized.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ablahblah987 (talk • contribs)
- Delete. "Future star" = Future Wikipedia article. Fan1967 17:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per the comments of Ablahblah987 which prove its nn-ness. Metros232 18:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Although a "future star" he is known by many in the amateur film community. Ablahblah987
- Delete, possible hoax is being very generous. Kuru talk 18:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- What do you mean by generous? And it's not a hoax by the way. You're insulting me and Jake McLean.Ablahblah987
- No, where is McLean High School? Any similarity between the two is purely coincidental.Ablahblah987
- That must have been my cousin. I've been telling him to stay away from my computer. Ablahblah987
- Not if it was cousin who did that logged on as me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ablahblah987 (talk • contribs) Ablahblah987
- If this Jake McLean isn't the same Jake McLean that goes to McLean High School, then where did THIS Jake McLean go to high school? Surely that'd be an awesome thing to include in his biography. Metros232 18:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- The history clearly shows your posts right before and after. You've had your fun, kid. Go play somewhere else.. Fan1967 18:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- That would be a good thing to include, but I don't know where he went to school. Somewhere in Australia or New Zealand I think. Ablahblah987
- This movie trilogy is very important because it shows how a young man can transform into a hero. Also, this movie was very popular in its time and deserves to stay up becuase of its signifigant meaning to life. This movie saved by life when I thought I was going to die. This movie trilogy is very important because it shows how a young man can transform into a hero. Also, this movie was very popular in its time and deserves to stay up becuase of its signifigant meaning to life. This movie saved by life when I thought I was going to die.--Roboguyspacedude 19:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Brand new account created three minutes before this post. Fan1967 18:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- my last post is valid because I am a human and thus it is valid. I only joined so that I could help keep this vaild and naturally detailed entry. I saw it while browsing and I remember when I was a kid and dedcided to help defend it. That is why I joined so shortly, because I never felt like editing anything until I knew I had to defend this really good documentary of the movies in the Jake McLean series. How I used to love them. --Roboguyspacedude 19:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously, and charge the troll with capital offences. TheMadBaron 19:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Who's the troll and what do you mean by capital offence? What do you have against Jake McLean anyway?Ablahblah987Ablahblah987 19:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with TheMadBaron. No citations, no credibility, and no use on Wikipedia. Noetic Sage 19:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Low credibility, amateur?? Maltesedog 20:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah I forgot about citaions. Whatever, I don't care anymore, but Jake McLean will have his day.Ablahblah987 19:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.