Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Ryan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus for deletion in this debate/discussion.. Navou banter 02:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jake Ryan

Jake Ryan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only one source - we need multiple sources. Most of the article is trivia. Will (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Seems like a non-notable catchphrase to me. Not enough sources and no real claim to notability as far as I can tell. Wikidudeman (talk) 13:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge the sourceable content into Sixteen Candles as it could be used to bolster the continuing notability of the film. --Metropolitan90 17:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - I don't think these are reasons to delete the article. We can just add sources and information. Unless it's backed by a WP:N entry, "non-notable" is purely arbitrary in my mind, (although I've used it before). Cool Bluetalk to me 20:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Cool Blue. It's notable, it just needs more cites, which I'm sure can be gotten. Bearian 00:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect sourced material to Sixteen Candles. The mentions just barely pass the threshold for inclusion in the article; they do not warrant a separate article. Per WP:FICT fictional characters should be discussed in the main article for the fiction in which they appear. Otto4711 16:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - the subject of a long article in a major newspaper, so passes notability. I added a ref, so it can be improved. - Peregrine Fisher 20:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • merge and redirect per Otto4711. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 19:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.