Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Robinson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep as nomination withdrawn. - Mailer Diablo 03:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jake Robinson

A player in the "second-highest [football] division in England." That's like being a minor-league baseball player right? Sounds non-notable. Andrew Levine 10:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC) Nomination withdraw, as it seems I know nothing about English football. Andrew Levine 06:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

  • I completed the afd by putting the template on the page and cleaned up and wikified it a bit. Still sounds non-notable to me. No opinion WhiteNight T | @ | C 10:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletions. -- Rob 10:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, he is a professional footballer in the Football League Championship which has a total attendance of 9.6 million. Of course move to Jake Robinson. Punkmorten 11:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep as per above. Jcuk 11:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep above info is persuasive WhiteNight T | @ | C 11:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, of course. Championship players are notable. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep This page could do with being templated. Is there a template for footballers? A quick scan through several premiership teams suggests not. A project for someone on the football/soccer portal, perhaps? -- (aeropagitica) UK 19:09, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per above --Jaranda wat's sup 20:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, as professional football players are notable. Carioca 00:28, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.