Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Nava

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jake Nava

Jake Nava (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Prod removed by IP without comment. No verification or encyclopedic content, simply an unverified list of people and companies, and external links to commercial sites. Deiz talk 22:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep refs need to be put in the article, but they exist. 99 google news mentions [1]. Merkin's mum 23:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

  • That doesn't address the nomination (no content) or lack of compliance with WP:BIO. We know he produces music videos, which is pretty much all the Google news references assert, but it takes more than working with notable people and passing mentions in online entertainment news reports, even 99 of them in various languages, to satisfy our notability criteria. Deiz talk 00:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Seems to be rather prolific, and it's difficult to find information on music video directors. I added an external link. JuJube (talk) 03:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've only scratched the surface of the Google news sources linked above and have already found 5 which show notability. How can Deiz say, "he produces music videos, which is pretty much all the Google news references assert" and, "passing mentions in online entertainment news reports"? Did you actually look at those search results? Phil Bridger (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Because sometimes you need to light a fire under peoples arses :) Nice work.. Deiz talk 22:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.