Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Milliman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Claims of notability were not supported by any reliable sources --- indeed not by any sources at all -- either in the article or in this debate. DES ^(talk) 23:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jake Milliman

Jake Milliman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

PROD removed, non-notable wrestler, fails WP:V, WP:A and WP:BLP. Darrenhusted 00:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom and my original vote. Nikki311 00:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, wrestled as a jobber, won no titles, and the article has no sources. Nenog 03:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not a notable wrestler and no sources. OysterGuitarst 04:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —John Vandenberg 09:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Very notable wrestler for AWA in the 1980s and 1990. He won a ton of important matches and was a big part of the AWA. He won the Team Challenge Series battle royal, he beat Col. Debeers in the "Turkey on a pole match" and was a phenomenal wrestler. Needs an article. Dannycali 00:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, he does not "need" and article. His notability is questionable, try establishing it. Darrenhusted 12:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, wikipedia is not a place for articles on jobbers. MPJ-DK 11:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment in the nature of pro wrestler, some of the "loser" wrestlers can be as notable and important as midcard ones. Just because you think he is a "jobber" doesn't mean it should be deleted. Dannycali 03:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

...and it's not a reason to keep him. Darrenhusted 11:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

...and you are a jerk and idiot. Dannycali 02:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

...reign it in there tough guy. Darrenhusted 08:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep For reasons given by dannycali. Should Barry Horowitz not have an article just because he was a jobber? DanZero 04:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, no. I know who Barry Horowitz is, but I have never heard of Jake Milliman. Darrenhusted 12:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.