Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Henning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. @pple complain 17:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jake Henning

Jake Henning (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Young footballer whose article has no independent sources to establish notability. Also WP:COI Cap'n Walker 19:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:COI and WP:N. STORMTRACKER 94 20:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: NN. Although, COI isn't really a reason to delete a page. Articles with COI should be rewritten (if possible) as they typically fail to meet a neutral point of view. But since this person is not notable anyways, the evident COI just helps to delete it. - Rjd0060 22:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Probably should've been a speedy. -Jmh123 18:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
    • No, it asserts notability (obviously the claim has been proven to be false, but the policy clearly says "being a hoax" is not a CSD candidate). ugen64 20:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 20:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Obviously fails WP:BIO (Has not played in a fully professional league), but is it a hoax too? пﮟოьεԻ 57 20:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Well according to their website, the manager of Beccles Town since 2004 has been one Paul Mobbs, so that bit certainly isn't true. Overall, a catastrophic failure to meet WP:BIO. Delete ChrisTheDude 20:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - as per nom. GiantSnowman 21:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:BIO by a long way. --Malcolmxl5 02:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.