Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Goody
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jade Goody
- Nominating for Deletion Reason: Jades article is just being vandalized all the time and no one seem to respect this article. The article in it self is also not very well written and i think Jade is not notable enough, what has she done more then being on big brother? and she didnt even win.--Matrix17 13:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete, on the same claims as before, not notable, to mutch vandalizm, she didnt even win big brother.--Matrix17 13:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Very notable individual in the UK. Regan123 14:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Vandalism isn't a reason for deletion. I'm not a big fan of "reality show star" articles, but this is arguably one of the best sourced articles of this type here. I've never heard of her, but an enormous amount of press has been dedicated to her apparently; well exceeding WP:BIO.--Isotope23 14:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Due to her stupidity when on Big Brother she received a lot of unfortunate attention from UK tabloid newspapers. She's been on the media frequently since, and was even included in the latest "Celebrity" (emphasis on quotation marks) Big Brother, and then promptly generated a row over racism. So, Keep on Wikipedia, preferably delete her from real life. SimonRK 14:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't watch television, so I have no knowledge of her from that medium, but I can't help but be confronted almost daily with images of her staring at me from the tabloids and magazines at my local corner store. She must easily meet the "multiple, independent published sources". —Psychonaut 14:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This individual is notable. Unfortunately. --Folantin 15:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. This is one of several suspected bad faith AfD's initiated by User:Matrix17 recently --Mhking 15:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep and snowball to closure. MLA 15:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment:MLA and Mhking are totally wrong im not doing this to be mean im doing this because Jade actually isnt notable at all. What has she done? except not winning big brother?--Matrix17 15:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this is a serious question but assuming good faith that it is, this is a highly notable person in the UK who has received numerous and ongoing media coverage, has been the endorsement face of a series of ventures, is a millionaire as a result of her celebrity exposure, and was the center of an international scandal. MLA 15:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Unfortunately, she is very notable as mentioned by the two previous comments. I have never watched either Big Brother or Celebrity Big Brother, but I can confirm that she is about the only participant I can name - that's notabilty! Emeraude 15:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment: MLA always use Comment: before you write here. and for the other matter i dnt now what the fuss is about i dont think this person is notable. I dont think so, YOU dont have to think so. and if you dont believe it will be deleted well then just let it have its course and you donthave to worry.i actually believes it should be deleted. so what.--Matrix17 15:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy snow keep --Aude (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and WP:SNOW . Bad faith nom. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 15:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.