Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jada Deville
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 16:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Jada Deville
Delete. Non-notable stripper who has won seemingly-minor awards. Little information to be found on Google, only a few non-commercial mentions. Unlikely this could be turned into more than a stub. Flata 00:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand if possible...minor notability--MONGO 05:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- I've tried to expand but there's no real information I can find to expaand it with. Even if I go through and mine out her proportions, all the awards she's won, and the porn flicks she's been in, there's not enough out there, today, to make more than a stub -- I tried, though maybe my methods were flawed. That said, there isn't even enough information on the awards she's done to have so much as a stub page for them, so they'd stay red links for a fair time. Look at the original revision of the article and the similar fanboyish pages thrown up by the original author. Non-wikified, which I can forgive, but not exactly content-rich or encyclopedic. --Flata 10:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- I fail to see how Miss Nude Universe can be a minor award. Please enlighten me. - Mgm|(talk) 10:02, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- I can get a friend to give me some titles ending in "Universe", if you like, doesn't mean it merits anything. I can't find much about the Miss Nude Universe pageant. It's run by someone called "Rio Rivers", the one that our Jada Deville won was in a strip club in St. Robert, Missouri. It depends how you define notable. Is the stripping circuit itself notable? This is an award made up of people on the stripping circuit, that is, people who tour as strippers. Most of them also do porn and might be notable for that, but I'd never even heard of this stripping circuit stuff, which surprises me a fair bit. There are 133 Google results for "Miss Nude Universe" "Rio Rivers", what with trying to find out information about the specifics and the organizers and so much. There's no information to be had, but the same news bites and people mentioning it casually. I'm interested in consensus as to whether the stripping circuit is per se notable. It does not seem to foster enough reading material to throw together articles on Miss Nude Universe, which as you point out, sure sounds like a non-minor title. --Flata 10:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete & Set Guideline. There are (guess) 300 pages on big-bust stars (all with their own money making web page). But they are in movies. This person is not. This will lead to perhaps 900 stripper pages (surprisingly all with their own money making sites). I'm sure they all win such awards. I judge this a mistake. 900 barely notable high schools is perhaps silly but no big deal. 900 barely notable strippers = 900 barely notable small business with free advertising. (No pun intended but hee hee). Miss Nude Galaxy or not, these people are akin to local nightclub singers doing New York, New York for a sales convention.Obina 11:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Arbitrary notability standards are POV and not valid criteria for deletion IMHO. Please see WP:NPOV Cynical 20:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Obina. Search4Lancer
23:47, 23 December 2005 (UTC) - Delete per Obina. Well put. --Thunk 02:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Obina, although no guideline should be set, I prefer to ignore all rules. Stifle 12:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete at best merge with a Miss Nude Universe article if one were to be created. (what, the Galactic Award for Deletion Voting was awarded already? I missed getting a ballot!) ++Lar
- Delete --Alf melmac 08:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
