Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob soper

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 15:56, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] jacob soper

I am the author of this page. I am unsure what Wikipedia will make of it, and having now read the rules for Vanity Articles, I thought I should submit this page for Wikipedia to make its feelings known. Jake soper 14:31, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

• I completed this Vfd for the above user, and my vote is Delete. --Several Times 14:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, requested by author and also does not assert notability. PubLife 15:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nominator Lullabye Muse 15:19, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under WP:CSD Articles 7. Thank you to the page's author for nominating the article, look forward to being edited by you. Sliggy 17:47, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
• This content would be fine if you wished to place it on your user page, however. Hope to see you around, and happy editing. Meelar (talk) 18:22, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy page. Uppland 06:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy. Self-admitted vanity by logged-in users needs userfying, not deletion. — JIP | Talk 06:22, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• This person does not meet the WP:BIO criteria, and Wikipedia is not the 'phone book. If Jake soper (talk · contribs) (a.k.a. 212.240.154.193 (talk · contribs)) had made any other contributions to Wikipedia my vote would have been "Userfy". However, he has not. Wikipedia is not a hosting service for people to have free user pages without contributing anything to the encyclopaedia. (That's not the intention of the author in this case. But it's the reason that I don't vote "Userfy" when in cases such as these there are no other contributions at all to the encyclopaedia.) Moreover, note that the user himself has expressed a wish at Talk:Jacob soper not to have this as his user page. Even were there grounds for userfication in this case, that would override them. Delete. Uncle G 16:02:50, 2005-08-24 (UTC)
• Delete. As per Uncle G. Also, just to Mr. Soper, it's a nice piece in terms of a philosophical statement. However, Wikipedia is not the place to make a philosophical statement. You say on your talk page, "Is there room for one small, ordinary person in this gallery?", but Wikipedia is not a gallery, nor is it a forum for opinions, philosophy, or bios of ordinary people: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is a well written article, and I hope that you stay and continue to contribute, but please understand what Wikipedia is and isn't. --Blackcap | talk 19:41, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I do wish every vanity writer would be so considerate, we'd have a lot more time to hunt for actual VfD suspects. --80.222.69.104 21:17, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.