Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackrabbit Slim's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--cj | talk 16:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jackrabbit Slim's

Jackrabbit Slim's (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable. Unspeedies, but I do not think this is encyclopedia-worthy Avi 02:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless sources can be added. BJ^Talk 02:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Pulp Fiction. Krimpet 03:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Reference in Pulp Fiction is sufficient. Edeans 05:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete "Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis...". OR throughout. -- IslaySolomon | talk 06:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• DElete per above. MER-C 10:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, google search turns up real places called this. Could be more than meets the eye, otherwise I'd support a redirect to Pulp Fiction. Mathmo ^Talk 12:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:FICT. Article claims this is a "key part of the film" because a minor plot development occurs at this location, but I don't think it's worth even a redirect, any more than we need a redirect for every character name and every location in every film ever made. Barno 18:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. A paragraph at most in Pulp Fiction should suffice. Arakunem 20:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.