Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack on fire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MastCell ^Talk 22:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jack on fire

Jack on fire (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable band that does not meet criteria of WP:BAND. Initially, there were three related articles: Institut Polaire, Ben Blakeney, and this one, all with related personnel. IP is notable. Blakeney was speedy deleted by request of the original editor. I proposed merging this article into IP's because of the overlapping personnel, but prevailing sentiment was that it's a separate project and the article should stand on its own. With no releases, Jack on fire fails to demonstrate notability, so deletion of the article is in order. —C.Fred (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Concur that band is currently not notable and therefore the article should be deleted however would support the merging of some of this article in Institut Polaire as it is relevant to that article. Dan arndt 02:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete and merge. The band aren't notable, worthy information could be added to the IP page, if any. Rehevkor 17:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I'd check with the creator of IP, before merging. Mbisanz 22:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.