Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack and George

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 09:28, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jack and George

Jack and George (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This film article was created by the creator of the film, and lacks any evidence of notability. Prod removed by creator with the comment, "I believe that the page is relevant. This is a forthcoming film that is being created by a local cinema group in Pendle, UK. We have an interview with localpress in a weeks time to discuss the film." FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• I apologise for not being experienced with Wikipedia. As the filmmaker, am I not allowed to create a page for the film? We are really excited about this as it is our first feature length production and wanted to get lots of things done about it, including a wiki page. If you feel it necesary then obviously I cannot stop you from deleting the page, although I do believe it is relevant to your users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevrobinson (talk • contribs)

• Delete. First, because there's no given independent sources, it violates verifiability policy. Second, per conflict of interest. The last reason is that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting your future film. Dekisugi (talk) 13:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• Fair enough. Sorry about that, I know now for future reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevrobinson (talk • contribs) 13:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete for all the reasons given above by Dekisugi. And to the creator, Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a promotional tool or a directory of films. I believe the site you're looking for is called IMDb. If, once the film is released, you can provide reputable, independent sources to prove notability, then you may have valid arguement for a wiki article. Tx17777 (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - film has not been released. Does not meet WP:N and WP is not a crystal ball. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 13:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• I have apologised, and accepted that I am not very experienced in creating wikipedia entries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevrobinson (talk • contribs) 13:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• delete nn film, coi, violates WP:V. nat.utoronto 13:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per verifiability policy, WP:COI, WP:NN and crystal ball. --Evb-wiki (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as per above, and as unsourced WP:OR. Cirt (talk) 17:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC).
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 19:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.