Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Shepherd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Stifle 02:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jack Shepherd

This arcticle needs to be merged, expanded, or deleted. Bmenrigh 10:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Since all of the information was about the television show or the character, rather than the actor the article was about, I've tagged it {{R with possibilities}}. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
    • after only nine three and three-quarter hours on afd? Very hasty! I've written the article. Hope it's a keeper now. Grutness...wha? 00:49, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
      • Well, when none of a subject's article is about the subject, only about the character he played or where the show was filmed, there's nothing there to save. However, I am now quite happy to vote a Speedy Keep on your excellent article. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
        • Fair enough - after seeing the original item, I tend to agree. And thanks for the comment on what I wrote :) Grutness...wha? 11:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Incredibly Strong Keep whats he doing on AfD anyhow!? Jcuk 01:06, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
    • you didn't see it as it was when it was tagged. Grutness...wha? 01:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
      • Granted, but even looking at it when it was tagged it looks like a keep and mark as a stub to me.... Jcuk 16:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep since article has been expanded as requested. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-03 01:39Z
  • Speedy Keep. The expansion make notability exceedingly clear. ×Meegs 16:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. OCNative 06:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.