Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabberwocky (writing magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per A7. Sr13 23:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jabberwocky (writing magazine)

Jabberwocky (writing magazine) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not a notable student magazine at all. Created in either 2001 or 2003, (doesn't matter), the article fails to make a case for its existence. The subject scores only 22 Ghits. There is nothing online about this mag outside of the university's own website, and all of the hits are of another magazine, or otherwise fail WP:RS Ohconfucius 03:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete CSD A7, no assertion of notability. Every college on earth has a club like this. Placeholder account 03:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Slay this article with the vorpal sword per nom. Unremarkable. MER-C 08:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete today, calloo, callay. NawlinWiki 15:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Tim.bounceback^{(talk | contribs | ubxen)} 19:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per User:NawlinWiki, who was much more creative than I could come up with for this article. Realkyhick 20:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Maybe if they worked as hard on their magazine as they do writing entries about it the mag would become notable. Qworty 20:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• A7 Speedy Delete Internal college magazines are not considered notable unless they are hugely famous beyond the college gates. A1octopus 21:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.