Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JScript.Encode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 04:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] JScript.Encode

JScript.Encode (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

this article is too short. can't be verified. Iamshawn 13:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, expand and source. ck lostsword|^queta!|_Suggestions? 13:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, you can't delete an article because its short.--Ac1983fan 13:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - being too short isn't grounds for deletion. Marked it as a stub instead. Mytildebang 17:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• keep per Mytildebang—Preceding unsigned comment added by RiseRobotRise (talk • contribs)
• Keep- per above--SUIT⁴² 18:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Like Mytildebang said, just mark it as a stub. Section9 19:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 04:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Twas Marked as {{stub}}- and with 23,000+ ghits, there's a lot of room to expand. SkierRMH,04:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to Active Scripting and Microsoft Script Engine. create a redirect from VBScript.Encode as well. John Vandenberg 13:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.