Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JSP (Internet Celebrity)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 19:17, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] JSP (Internet Celebrity)

NN, vanity. This article has already a fairly long and rocky edit history. Let's put it out of its misery. Rl 09:32, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as vanity. Though it does get bonus points for trying to claim someone as an "internet celebrity" even without a current website. Obviously JSP (being the Javascript file extension) and 665 (being a common number) are hard to Google, but a search for JSP +665 +vampire turned a handful of results but none relevant to the article subject within at least the first 5 pages. I'm not sure whether the allegedy-popular 665 website was located at 665-dot-com or not, but if it was, it hasn't been in the Alexa top 100,000 for at least 2 years, according to Alexa. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:51, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
    • Note/update: According to DS, the website in question is sixsixfive.com, which has a current Alexa rank of 483,063, and hasn't been in the top 100,000 for at least the past two years (older data not available, but likely similar). Better than nothing, I guess, but not nearly enough for an article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:26, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
    • It's not JavaScript, it's Java Server Pages, which is a completely different thing (being written in another language, and being server-side rather than client-side). — JIP | Talk 04:20, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • You're right... and I knew that too, I dunno where my head was at. In any case, the underlying statement is true, that being a common file extension, JSP's notability cannot be determined by a simple Google search. It's like if someone was nicknamed "MP3" or "HTML". You might get tons of results, but very few (if any) relevant ones. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:51, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • According to googlism, 665 is a "great site", "my favorite website", "an expressway spur into the city of annapolis", and is "affiliated with the international brotherhood of teamsters". Do not delete. 60.240.140.20 19:07, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Eh, there was (and still is) a lot of funny, very readable stuff at sixsixfive.com, but I wouldn't have deemed it (or the creator) notable. Delete. DS 14:10, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Above vote had been vandalised. I have restored it to the original version. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:01, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • I trust Starblind's assessment. Delete, unless proof surfaces. Mgm|(talk) 14:49, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • JSP is more notable than Fat Controller. Do not delete.
  • JSP, while as elusive as the dew on morning flowers, permeates the internet consciousness. He came up with the idea of chat pranks. DO NOT DELETE
  • Delete, and someone hurry up with adding an extra speedy case for blatant vanity. Chris 00:02, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete unsigned-sockish-supported vanity; "He came up with the idea of chat pranks" triggers my lameness filter severely. VfD debate so far suggests that this person's current or future "celebrity" significance is "as elusive as the dew on morning flowers". Barno 03:07, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Above vote had been vandalised. I have restored it to the original version. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:05, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Do not delete. JSP was the originator of the "Hampster Dance."
  • Delete as vanity supported by talking hosiery. - Lucky 6.9 06:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • For your information, I have spoken with JSP about this controversy. He is extremely unhappy that he is included on this website because he feels he is too famous and important. I told him that Winston Churchill and Stryper had articles too, but he wouldn't listen. KEEP
  • Delete, vanity. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:24, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Do Not Delete Everyone knows who JSP is. His fame reaches far and wide. An internet dictionary just isn't complete without a JSP entry.
  • Do not delete. JSPs ghostly internet presence was a runner up for beatification by the dearly departed pope JPII as the patron saint of the internet. Do not desecrate his memory with your rash and ill-considered plans. I must say that I find this kind of despoilment completely typical of the bearded and slovenly inhabitants of the internets. I pray that you know not what you do.
    • The above by User:203.45.168.124. RickK 08:15, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sock puppet limit has been reached. RickK 07:39, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep The hampster dance comments seem to have merit, and I doubt JSP (Internet Celebrity) is responsible for the support of the entry.
    • You only get to vote once, User:67.188.68.113. But be advised that anonymous votes are generally not counted. RickK 08:15, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
      • RickK, maybe you should double check the IP addresses. I did not make the comment above. I have not voted twice. I corrected your comment as to who really wrote it. It took me 3 tries initially due to some errors in my link. (User 67.188.68.113)
        • You're right, I apologize. I misread the diff. RickK 08:39, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. Webmaster and blogger without a website? popular with the vampire community? WTF? Seems to be popular with the sockpuppet community. jni 13:02, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep JSP is in a PSV, in this state he could not possibly be creating a 'vanity' entry. This entry must remain to show why 665 stopped updating several years ago. Like Terri Schiavo, we cannot allow his memory to be erased; We cannot give up hope!
    • Remark by User:67.115.122.75, user's first edit. Kill the socks!
  • Delete - utter nonsense supported by sockpuppets only- Skysmith 07:21, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, extreme vanity. Radiant_* 08:59, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, too obscure for Internet celebrity. Grue 06:43, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete and more socks than a dresser drawer. DDerby 10:13, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity. Xezbeth 18:51, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.