Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JG Summit Holdings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep due to changes made since nomination. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] JG Summit Holdings

JG Summit Holdings (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Not notable enough to qualify under WP:CORP Walton monarchist89 17:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete unless something comes up. Could probably be deleted as {{db-empty}}. --Calton | Talk 01:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CORP and WP:VERIFY. No assertions of notability that are properly cited to reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 06:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment There are now serveral reliable third party published sources about this company cited in the article. --Oakshade 03:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Article still has some unverified info, but that can be fixed. Most importantly, it now has sufficient assertions of notability that are verified by reliable, third-party sources. Nice work. -- Satori Son 14:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep According to the Manila Times, it was one of the most profitable companies in the Phillipines in 2006 on the Philippine Stock Exchange. [1] and it is a component of the The Philippine Stock Exchange 30-company Blue Chip Index [2][3], another qualifier (#3) for WP:CORP. Many news stories, like this one. --Oakshade 21:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC) (Amended with index info. --Oakshade 06:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC))
  • Comment from proposer OK fair enough. There weren't any sources in the article when I AfD'd it, but I've now changed my opinion and think it should stay. Walton monarchist89 10:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.