Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JFW

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] JFW

JFW (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I believe this is or may be a neologism. Fastfinge 17:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge with List of internet slang phrases, although it is of interest to note (1), List of internet slang phrases already lists JW as meaning "just works", and (2), the author of the article attempts to justify the addition of the F ("fucking") to the acronym, leading me to be suspicious of the article's factual accuracy. I'm going to do a bit of googling and see what comes up. Calgary 18:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Unsourced, non-notable term. JulesH 18:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Don't merge into List of internet slang phrases unless non-trivial sources can be found.--Absurdist 19:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Supported by FOUR ghits[1], all collections of acronyms rather than primary occurrences on Usenet/Blogs. Don't replace it with a redirect to my userpage please :-) JFW | T@lk 21:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:NEO, since no independent reliable sources are discussing it as the main subject of an article or book. Even if it were used in ten million blogs, it wouldn't be enough for WP:NOTE; independent non-trivial sources, in other words not blogs, have to be discussing the abbreviation. Edited. --Charlene 22:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete origional research--SefringleTalk 05:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as neologism of WP:OR and without any cultural refs. Bearian 12:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Deleteas per JulesH Harlowraman 22:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.