Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JACOS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 02:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JACOS

JACOS (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Deleted prod. No secondary source citations as required by WP:CORP. Nsevs • Talk 21:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as with nominationKeep This has been much improved, and now it does read like a wikipedia article. although I would personaly like to see some more stuff that ties it to a larger social context (I think that makes sence) it definatly dosn't need to be deleted now.Coffeepusher (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - spammy. – ukexpat (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. BanRay 23:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: The author has since added additional secondary sources. I'm still not convinced that the notability guidelines are met, however, so my nomination stands.--Nsevs • Talk 21:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. The article is messy and needs to be rewritten. However, there are enough secondary sources to fix the main problem. The problem probably is that the author is newcomer and not familiar with WP policies. Probably we should encourage him/her and avoiding deleting his/her first article. I will work on this article and will see if am able to fix the problems.Beagel (talk) 08:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I hope the problems are fixed now.Beagel (talk) 10:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep: Beagel has done a pretty good job tidying it up, and I will do a bit as well. 14:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• Strong keep: I think this is significant enough that I am going to write a reference to it in the History of the petroleum industry in Canada (oil sands and heavy oil), and include a link. I have now done that. It is a useful part of the history, and it motivated me to do a major rewrite of that section. 15:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• Withdrawn: the article has come a long way since NP patrol.--Nsevs • Talk 21:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.