Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izumicon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Izumicon

Izumicon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An advertisement for an anime convention that has yet to hold its first event. The article does not assert the convention's notability nor can any reliable third-party sources can be found for it to pass WP:N. Was speedy tagged for deletion, but an admin removed the tags with the comment that we should "wait a month to see if the article improves once the convention is held." However, we can't WP:CRYSTALBALL notability. --Farix (Talk) 23:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I understand this article may be deleted, but please don't call it an ad. This is not an ad, it is only info regarding to an convention. I am going to the convention so I will have actual info regarding this event. All I'm asking for is time. Please allow me to keep my article up, till i get back from the convention and put the info up.--SMOKEMNHALO2001 21:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Adding information about the convention will not solve the problem with notability. What this article needs is multiple independent sources. These do not exist.Obina 10:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as this is 24-carat spam.--Gavin Collins 08:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Even though i cleaned this article up from its original state, i don't think it meets the notability requirements. I cannot find any reliable, third party sources and i doubt we will be able to find these until the convention is over. I think it was created with the best of intentions, but the sourcing does not meet wikipedias standards. Woodym555 11:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Obina has it exactly right. JodyB Roll, Tide, Roll 16:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Spam. —ScouterSig 15:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - does not assert notability or have reliable sources. --Rocksanddirt 17:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.