Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izowned

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 12:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Izowned

"Izowned" doesn't seem to be encyclopedic. Not sure I can put it any other way.. JHMM13 08:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Merge and Redirect to Pwn if verified to have any moderate currency of use, otherwise, delete. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 08:24, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I don't see any connection to Internet usage, so why redirect to Pwn? -- Dalbury^(Talk) 00:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

This AfD discussion did not gather enough votes for consensus, relisting. Please add your comments below this line. — JIP | Talk 06:27, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Movementarian 07:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary states very clearly that slang definitions are not valid content. Nonforma 07:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Nonforma. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 08:17, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT. --Alan Au 08:20, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.