Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivo draganac

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Speedy deleted. Joyous 00:19, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ivo draganac

This page should be deleted as it seems to be a promotional autobiography written by User:Ivodraganac (his contributions). --Neigel von Teighen 18:10, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Not only is this vanity, blatant self-promotion, and half in another language, it's also a copyvio from the link given. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:13, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
  • Ugh, user has also now created Id design and Id music which are just copies of the same text. Those should be deleted when this is deleted. I'm almost tempted to say that these are all speedys. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:15, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
    • I have speedied those two as multiarticle spam. They were exactly identical copies of this junk. Delete or userfy to User:Ivodraganac (without redirect). jni 18:42, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity or misplaced user page, it doesn't belong here. --InShaneee 20:34, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity page, and not even a very interesting one. Ganymead 22:48, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable enough, vanity, personal advertisement. Megan1967 01:25, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• If Ivodraganac had contributed anything else, I've have said Userfy. But xe hasn't. This is clearly hit-and-run advertising rather than an attempt to help build an encyclopædia. Delete. Uncle G 14:50, 2005 Jan 28 (UTC)
• Delete. Gamaliel 20:14, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for being unverifiable. The person who wrote the article emailed the board asking for it to be deleted. Angela. 20:47, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
• This can be deleted as a speedy now under criteria 10. Any article which is requested for deletion by the original author, provided the author reasonably explains that it was created by mistake, and the article was edited only by its author. The only edits other than by the author are related to deletion and the email specifically states that the author created this by mistake -- sannse (talk) 01:01, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I've gone ahead and done this -- sannse (talk) 01:11, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.