Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Špaček

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bucketsofg 02:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ivan Špaček

Ivan Špaček (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. Absolutely non notable blog owner and citizen. Article created long time ago by his friend and in the Czech Rep. notorious poisoner Ross Hedvicek. The article is currently undergoing AFD process on CS Wiki with overwhelming majority of votes for deletion The article was deleted on cs.wikipedia ( Cinik 09:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC) fixed), see [1]. Darwinek 20:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - non notable person. IMHO it is possible this person does not exist. Cinik 21:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. ...writer and author, founder of several literary movements... - with 616 Google hits, most of them blogs, net profiles and wiki and its mirrors.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non notable, not verifiable, etc... — ♥Tohru Honda13♥ 22:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails notability. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 00:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete AntOnTrack 13:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Jan.Kamenicek 19:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Founder of Literary Cubism :-o Maybe he should be listed in the article on Cubism prior to Guillaume Apollinaire and Gertrude Stein ;-)
  • Delete. Not notable.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I am not literary expert (that's why it's not important that I never heard about this man) but I seriously doubt he could be "the founder of literary cubism" because it existed several decades before his birth. Any ideas as to what else he supposedly "founded"? The article dubiously claims "founder of several literary movements", without being specific. Also, the sentence "His writings... are target of vandalism" doesn't make much sense to me. Should it be "target of parody" instead? --Fuxoft 17:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Aktron 21:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


  • Keep - I do not think it is beneficial to Czech culture and Czech reputation altogether to organize these RAIDS on articles on currently unpopular emigres. You should be ashamed of yourself. Ross.Hedvicek 13:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Well known person in the Czech Republic. --Semenáč 14:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

*Keep - Why some strange guys or who is trying to "edit" or even "clean" our recent history in this particular area ? One of others. 8 February 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.160.5.222 (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC).

    • (this vote is not valid, it is the only contribution of this IP. strong suspicion of being Mr. Hedvicek's sockpuppet) - Darwinek 20:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I resent another attack by Darwinek at me. I do not use other identities, as a matter of fact I am the only one here who uses his real name here - not anonymous nick. I request that Darwinek is called to order. Thank you. Ross.Hedvicek 20:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I second Darwinek's cancelation of that vote and reasons for doing that. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 20:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment: well known ?! Who is that man ? What did he write ? He is not notable only because he emigrated< that means nothing for his notability. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 18:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
An emigration itself is sufficiently notable - otherwise it would not be submitted for VfD. Ross.Hedvicek 19:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
You mean that everyone who left country should have an article on wikipedia ? Are you kidding ? ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 19:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
No, vice versa. Your ilk hates him, BECAUSE he emigrated. That'swhy you want him to be deleted. Ross.Hedvicek 19:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Internet (and Wikipedia) is here so we know about the interesting people and not to pretend that they do not exist. Ivan Kuhn —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.168.242.64 (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC).

Article about Ivan Spacek was expanded since AfD input. I suggest vote to be cancelled as a non-issue. It was ridiculous to submit it as AfD in the first place. And I also object to Darwinek's postings of derogative and offensive messages on my personal pages. Ross.Hedvicek 17:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks to your typo, the sentence in the article "he actively participated in exile's communisty activities" doesn't make it clear if he was active in the community or active communist. Please fix. Thanks. --Fuxoft 17:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Ross Hedvicek you are that one who attacks us, this is your addition at jan.kamenicek talk page:
To uz vam vsem mladym v Cesku uplne jebe? Ty vase neustale najezdy na emigranty uz nejsou ani ubohe, ani trapne - jsou vyslovene ostudne. Ross.Hedvicek 13:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Translation: Are all youngs fucked up in Czech ? Your permanent attacks on emmigrants are not only miserable and embarassing - they are shameful.
Stop personal attacks immediately, if you will continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 18:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Tulkolahten: please handle personal attack by Dawinek on me. Thank you. Ross.Hedvicek 18:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Which one ? That sentence full of irony about Paroubek ? ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 18:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I see that as personal attack. Ross.Hedvicek 19:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

For all non-Czech users. Mr. Hedvicek is a well-known internet spammer, vandal, wannabe and Czech far-right exile living in the USA. See article on him on CS Wiki [2]. He is known for disparagement of the Czech Republic, his politicians, people etc. He hates country that gave him life and does everything here to damage its image. He thinks we all living here are communist indoctrinated filth and all exiles (even fraudsters) are heroes. - Darwinek 20:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

This is FOURTH personal attack by Darwinek within just a few hours! Ross.Hedvicek 20:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


By writing this, you are kinda lowering yourself to his level of filth. It doesn't matter if it's true. It's enough for anyone to have a logical look at the article and on the defense Ross uses for its existence, to see who is right and who is not. Even as a psychopath, Communist or Nazi, Ross could've written a worthy Wikipedia article. But it seems it didn't happen this time... --Fuxoft 20:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
And another personal attack by Fuxoft. Hm. What is wrong with those young Czechs? Why they are so angry? Ross.Hedvicek 20:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
To quote yourself: "That's only your personal opinion. Who made you a judge?" Yes, it sounds kinda stupid, desn't it? --Fuxoft 20:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Where ? ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 20:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Up page. Ross.Hedvicek 21:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop all personal attacks against exiles! It is uncivilized! Ross.Hedvicek 18:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually attack came from you only. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 18:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I do not see any. Ross.Hedvicek 18:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, that's exactly the problem. You probably honestly think that you don't attack people. Which is kinda sad... --Fuxoft 20:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
See comment above. You attacked jan.kamenicek. Any editor could nominate any article to AfD process and you can't send him offensive comments about that as you did. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 18:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I see your patronizing comments towards me as a personal attack. Ross.Hedvicek 19:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I put a notice on Darwinek's talk page to be upright, but his edit is rather uncivility but yours is an obvious personal attack. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 19:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
That's only your opinion against mine. Or somebody made you a judge? Ross.Hedvicek 19:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Maybe I should report your personal attack and his uncivility to some administrator requesting your block, we will see ... ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 19:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do just that - and identify yourself correctly as a Czech with prejudices against exiles - so everything is clear. Thank you. Ross.Hedvicek 19:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do just that - and identify yourself correctly as a blatant prattler with predujices against nappies - so everything is clear. Thank you. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 20:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I admit having prejudices against local tyrants. Ross.Hedvicek 20:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Really ? ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 20:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Really. Ross.Hedvicek 21:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to point out that Cinik, Aktron, AntOnTrack, Fuxoft and possibly others do not have enough editations on EN Wiki to qualify for vote. I am requesting their votes to be disqualified. Ross.Hedvicek 21:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Irrelevant. I have over 200 edits here on en.wiki. Just check the contributions list before shooting. --Aktron 21:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Vote can be disqualified only and only if it is IP address, single purpose account, sockpuppet or if it was created after the AfD debate beginning. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 21:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, this is one of the RH's untruths. Like usually. A request to block him has been already written at the admins noticeboard. --Aktron 21:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
That's right man. My c. 40,000 edits is way too little. - Darwinek 21:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
40,000 edits only ? No way, you are obviously singlepurpose account ... ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 21:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Ross.Hedvicek edits stats:
User:Ross.Hedvicek
run at Thu Feb 8 21:59:29 2007 GMT
Category: 2
Mainspace 346
Talk: 24
User talk: 36
User: 63
Wikipedia talk: 2
Wikipedia: 26
avg edits per article 2.48
earliest 15:07, 3 March 2006
number of unique articles 201
total 499
≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 22:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Founder of Literary Cubism"?

Do you still stand by this statement, Mr. Hedvicek? Although challenged, you didn't retract it from the article (while making other edits to the article) and you didn't offer any explanation as to how could anything be founded by someone who was born several decades after the existence of given movement was extensively documented. If you meant something else than "literary cubism", your correction is also needed, of course... --Fuxoft 22:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I stand by it. Ross.Hedvicek 00:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.