The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Non admin closure). Qst 18:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
This feels like original research MarlithT/C 01:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep This party is all over the web. Its a real party. I think the article need extensive additions, cleaning, wikification and sources, but defo keep. scope_creep 01:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, let us clean it up. Sorry. MarlithT/C 01:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep: Need a lot of work, google shows it is notable. - Rjd0060 03:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.