Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Its Business Baby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 12:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Its Business Baby

Its Business Baby (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

non-notable web-based business, all of the sources presented have been worthless. Fredrick day (talk) 15:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete RS coverage is false positives and ghits don't assert any notability. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 16:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete it also reads like an advertisement. This is essentially a second to TRAVELLINGCARI's statement. --Belinrahs (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, concur with all above. Web based businesses need a fairly strong showing from the outset. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Majoreditor (talk) 00:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Baby. RFerreira (talk) 19:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
• snowball delete advertising plus a version of this article was already deleted. Special Random (Merkinsmum) 23:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.