Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itlizard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Veinor (talk to me) 01:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Itlizard

Itlizard (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Not speedying this as spam, as there's that vague assertion of notability (the award), plus a number of editors seem to have at least glanced at this without being tempted to delete it - but this looks like an unsalvageable piece of spam ("other projects are planned but are considered top secret", indeed!). As always, perfectly willing to be persuaded it's keepable. — iridescent 21:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - for now. The award the site won isn't cited and there aren't any other claims of notability. However, with some citations and the removal of some the POV elements (top secret?), I'd be willing to change my opinion. Tnxman307 (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable. KTC (talk) 00:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - might be a great site, but notability not established.  Frank  |  talk  11:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete in the absence of third-party reliable sources to establish notability (I've briefly searched Google News and Books, and found nothing). Jakew (talk) 19:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources indicates to me that the article fails to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.