Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itiva
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- Drini 04:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Itiva
I am proposing this article for deletion for the following reasons:
- Company does not meet notability guidelines WP:CORP
- Software does not meet notability guidelines WP:CORP or proposed notability guidelines for software WP:SOFTWARE
- No independent sources given with research independent of company
- Apparently false claims: http fetches and web caches have been used for streaming video by Forbidden Technologies plc for six years. Lack of independent reports make their claim impossible to verify so failing WP:V
- Original article apparently added by company members and article reads like a brochure, failing WP:VSCA
- Article introduces Neologism WP:NEO
- Article was added prior to an exhibition at the start of May. I have left it up to give the company time to get some independent press coverage as a result of this exhibition. None has been produced
- I have not received any replies to my query on the talk page dated 22 April 2006 asking for evidence of notability Stephen B Streater 09:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 15:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per comprehensive and well-researched nomination, from editor who is active in this field of technology so kknows of which he speaks. Just zis Guy you know? 13:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
