Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Istana Luwu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 15:32, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Istana Luwu

Appears to be a non-notable building. Can be merged to the city. Stifle 14:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment - it's linked from Crown jewels and List of palaces, it appears to be a palace in Central Sulawesi. The article as written doesn't even say this much, of course, so as-is it is worse than useless, however I'd suggest that a proper article on the place would probably be kept, if only to counter systemic bias. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 14:39, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

• Added some context, vote keep. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 14:43, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep the more-viable stub we now have. I don't suppose you worked from any sources you'd be willing to cite there, by any chance, Just zis Guy, you know?? — Haeleth Talk 22:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

• Some of it came from the linked articles on Wikipedia, the comment re Ductch influence was in the original and is not inconsistent with the one picture a Google Images search found. I didn't try that hard ;-) - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 23:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep: a stub, not a very good one, but nothing wrong with it either. Naturenet | Talk 10:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.