Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isley nicole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Shimeru 01:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Isley nicole

Isley nicole (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

According to her IMDB credits her roles mainly consist of names along the lines of: Beautiful Babe, Maid, Fantasy Girl, Friend, and repeatedly being Trophy Model for BET. Non-notable. IrishGuy ^talk 01:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• weak delete might meet WP:BIO if someone really did some digging, I don't see the evidence though [1]. But a relatively large number of credits would make me think there's a decent chance here... but we need some evidence. Also I've trimmed the article a bit... it looked like a copyvio but I couldn't tell of what. Certainly seems to have been created as spam, more or less. --W.marsh 03:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Appears to be an autobiography.--Ng.j 17:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as she appears to have headlined at least one film listed on Amazon.com. I added it to the article, although it really needs cleanup. I am not big on deleting articles that merely require cleanup and more information. Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 00:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• comment She was in a direct to video glorified music video. How is that notable? WP:BIO states: With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions That is significant roles in films plural. One direct to video does not notability make. IrishGuy ^talk 04:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete. The case for WP:BIO is tenuous at best. WP:AUTO is not clear criterion for deletion, but it certainly suggests which direction the information in the article may be slanted. Rookwood^{Dept. of Mysteries} 21:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.