Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic medicine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to Early Muslim medicine. – ABCD✉ 17:20, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Islamic medicine
- Meaningless substub. There is already an article on early muslim medicine --Porturology 12:58, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Then change it to a redirect? Enochlau 13:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Porturology. There is nothing here worth keeping. Capitalistroadster 07:07, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect. Nothing worth keeping. -- Marcika 11:57, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Early Muslim medicine, per above. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) | (contribs) 12:00, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Early Muslim medicine. Dcarrano 18:17, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
Comments only - no vote: Is the writer trying to say something about Unani medicine"? --Bhadani 18:48, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Redirec to Early Muslim medicine.--Irishpunktom\talk 19:31, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect as above. Notable historical relevance. — RJH 23:39, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand: notable historical relevance, but the intent of the article on Early Muslim medicine seems to be different from the two examples that the author gives. These seem to be more in line with the contents of this article from NIH. The first article is about scripture based medical systems, the second about the beginnings of scientific medicine. They are both historically notable, but distinct. Bambaiah 10:24, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
