Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam and racism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 06:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Islam and racism

Islam and racism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is a clear POV fork, and is not very encyclopediac. The article presents a rebuddle to the claim that Islam is racist, but does not present the allegation. It makes no sense to have an article that refutes an allegation that was never made. I looked for a notable or scholarly source that made the allegation; there are none that I am aware of; the closest thing I could find was a reader comment to something Daniel Pipes wrote;[1] nothing that could go in the article. Because of the lack of another POV, this article is a POV fork, refuting a point that was never made, and is going to remain as such. SefringleTalk 06:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. —SefringleTalk 06:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletions. —SefringleTalk 06:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This looks like a series of notes in search of an encyclopedia article. As written, there's nothing coherent about it. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 06:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - looks like a clear POV fork to me, and mostly an essay in this version --Haemo 07:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - fork. --Hillock65 15:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. While may be a vlid topic, the current article is a miserable original essay. `'Miikka 21:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete a lot of bollocks, that's all. It's a POV fork, and it doesn't even make sense. SalaSkan 00:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete what a mess.Proabivouac 22:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.