Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella V

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 14:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Isabella V

Isabella V (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

disputed PROD for NN-internet 'celebrity' delete DesertSky85451 21:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment Articles in Wired and elsewhere may fulfill WP:BIO. JoshuaZ 21:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete or Merge to some appropriate topic. It seems unlikely this article can ever be more than a stub of a sentence or two. Unless an appropriate topic can be found to house those sentences, they should be deleted. Valrith 22:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 07:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - relisting on JoshuaZ's request on my talkpage : it appears to me that her blog meets criterion 1 of WP:WEB "content has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the site" In particular, the articles in Wired and Esquire seem to fulfill this condition.. - Mailer Diablo 07:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Basically per the comment I made on Mailer diablo's talk page which he nicely quoted here. JoshuaZ 07:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 12:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not even an internet fad. Resolute 00:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep The Wired and Esquire articles are primarily about her and are great references that demonstrates notability (the German one seems to be primarily about her too, but I haven't read beyond seeing her name in every paragraph). --Oakshade 03:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn per nom. Eusebeus 12:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per JoshuaZ, Wired magazine printed coverage passes the WP:BIO notability criteria.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 01:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.