Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is Google Broken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close as delete per WP:SNOW.--Konst.able^Talk 00:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Is Google Broken

Original research and possibly advertising (link is to a site that performs search engine optimization). In fact, there is no substance to this article -- it exists to direct people toward the essay behind that external link. I believe that essay's point is already covered, in more encyclopedic and NPOV form, in the Google and History of Google articles. Shimeru 00:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

• This article unquestionably violates the Neutral point of view and No original research policies, and there's no hope for anything encyclopedic to be written in place of the current content, so delete. Picaroon9288 00:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Reads lika blog entry. Nothing of substance.00:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 00:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I've changed the category from I to W. Picaroon9288 00:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete half-essay. Danny Lilithborne 00:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, previous comments. Cbrown1023 00:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unformatted OR. Meh. Caknuck 00:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:NOR --Steve 02:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 02:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete on the grounds that it seems to be patent nonsense :-) Richard W.M. Jones 09:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Tried that one. It was judged un-speediable, so I guess it stays for a few days. Shimeru 10:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete because yes it is. Anomo 11:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "Grapevines" are not quantifiable references. GreenReaper 05:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.